Deepnet Security DualTrust vs Garrison Technology: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Short answer

Startup and SMB teams running on thin IT budgets will get real value from DualTrust because it isolates the browser in a hardened VM without requiring infrastructure overhaul or OS reimaging. It runs from a USB drive on existing hardware, resets to a clean state on each restart, and blocks host OS malware from touching your session, which covers the access control and platform security gaps that matter most when you lack a SOC. Skip this if you need centralized policy management across hundreds of endpoints or deep integration with your existing EDR stack; DualTrust's strength is surgical isolation for the individual machine, not fleet-wide threat hunting. Enterprise security teams defending against supply chain attacks and zero-days need Garrison Technology's hardware-enforced browser isolation because it eliminates the attack surface entirely rather than betting on detection. The appliance-based deployment means compromised websites never touch your endpoints, and the hardened architecture aligns with NIST PR.PS by enforcing security at the platform level where software controls alone fail. Skip this if your org needs lightweight per-user solutions or deep integration with your existing DLP stack; Garrison's strength is isolation-first, which demands acceptance of its deployment model and user experience tradeoffs.