Deepfence Detection & Response vs Deepfence ThreatStryker: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Deepfence Detection & Response

Mid-market and enterprise teams managing multi-cloud Kubernetes deployments will get the most from Deepfence Detection & Response because its eBPF sensors run lightweight enough to instrument production workloads without the usual performance tax of agent-based monitoring. The platform covers six NIST CSF 2.0 functions across detection and response, with particular strength in DE.CM and DE.AE for encrypted traffic visibility that most runtime tools skip. Skip this if you need vulnerability scanning or supply chain controls bundled in; Deepfence intentionally focuses on what happens at runtime, leaving CSPM and software composition analysis to other tools.

Deepfence ThreatStryker

Mid-market and enterprise teams running containerized workloads need runtime visibility that actually stops attacks, not just logs them; ThreatStryker's eBPF-based observability combined with automated workload quarantine gives you that. The tool covers the full detection-to-response chain from CI/CD vulnerability scanning through runtime threat analysis and incident mitigation, with ThreatGraph risk prioritization cutting through alert noise in complex environments. Skip this if you're looking for a compliance-first CNAPP or need deep CSPM coverage; ThreatStryker prioritizes runtime threats over configuration management.