Deepfence Detection & Response vs RAD Security Platform: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Deepfence Detection & Response

Mid-market and enterprise teams managing multi-cloud Kubernetes deployments will get the most from Deepfence Detection & Response because its eBPF sensors run lightweight enough to instrument production workloads without the usual performance tax of agent-based monitoring. The platform covers six NIST CSF 2.0 functions across detection and response, with particular strength in DE.CM and DE.AE for encrypted traffic visibility that most runtime tools skip. Skip this if you need vulnerability scanning or supply chain controls bundled in; Deepfence intentionally focuses on what happens at runtime, leaving CSPM and software composition analysis to other tools.

RAD Security Platform

Mid-market and enterprise security teams managing multi-cloud Kubernetes environments should pick RAD Security Platform for its lateral movement tracing, which most runtime tools treat as an afterthought. The eBPF-driven behavior verification integrates identity and data context to surface exploitability alongside blast radius, cutting through alert noise that plagues traditional CNAPPs. Skip this if you need CSPM or vulnerability management bundled in; RAD stays laser-focused on runtime detection and incident response, leaving asset discovery and risk assessment to your existing tools.