Deepfence Detection & Response vs Orca Security CWPP: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Deepfence Detection & Response

Mid-market and enterprise teams managing multi-cloud Kubernetes deployments will get the most from Deepfence Detection & Response because its eBPF sensors run lightweight enough to instrument production workloads without the usual performance tax of agent-based monitoring. The platform covers six NIST CSF 2.0 functions across detection and response, with particular strength in DE.CM and DE.AE for encrypted traffic visibility that most runtime tools skip. Skip this if you need vulnerability scanning or supply chain controls bundled in; Deepfence intentionally focuses on what happens at runtime, leaving CSPM and software composition analysis to other tools.

Orca Security CWPP

Mid-market and enterprise teams managing multi-cloud infrastructure will value Orca Security CWPP for its agentless scanning approach, which eliminates the operational friction of deploying agents across thousands of VMs and containers. The SideScanning technology covers workload inventory, vulnerability detection, malware, and runtime protection without requiring kernel instrumentation, cutting deployment time compared to agent-based competitors. Teams focused primarily on proactive vulnerability and configuration hunting will find it effective; teams expecting real-time incident response or SIEM integration should look elsewhere, as Orca prioritizes asset discovery and risk prioritization over reactive threat hunting.