Data-Tech Managed SOC (Guardian) vs SECUINFRA Cyber Defense: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Data-Tech Managed SOC (Guardian)

SMBs and mid-market shops without dedicated security staff should run Guardian if they need 24/7 monitoring without building a SOC; the SIEMless architecture and 35+ integrated security product connectors mean you're not stranded if your EDR or firewall vendor changes. The PSA ticketing integration cuts alert noise by routing only actionable findings to your IT team, which matters when you're thin on headcount. Skip this if your priority is incident recovery and forensics over detection; Guardian's NIST coverage is strong on continuous monitoring and threat analysis but light on the RS.MI mitigation and RS.AN investigation depth you'd need for complex breach response.

SECUINFRA Cyber Defense

Mid-market and enterprise teams without in-house SOC capacity should evaluate SECUINFRA Cyber Defense for its tiered MDR model and German data residency, which matters if you operate under stricter regional compliance. The vendor's ISO certification and focus on APT detection across the threat analysis and incident response chain (NIST DE.AE and RS functions) shows operational maturity. Skip this if you need managed SIEM or vulnerability management bundled in; SECUINFRA is detection and response only, leaving asset discovery and exposure management to your existing tools.