Cypago Continuous Control Monitoring vs Fortra Tripwire Enterprise: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Short answer

Mid-market and enterprise compliance teams drowning in manual control evidence collection will see the immediate payoff here: Cypago Continuous Control Monitoring automates what takes your team weeks, cutting the busy-work around SOC 2 and ISO 27001 audits. The no-code workflow automation plus GenAI-powered correlation engines mean you're actually monitoring controls in near real-time instead of scrambling for screenshots the week before your auditor arrives, and the platform covers NIST CSF 2.0 governance and risk assessment functions that most competitors treat as afterthoughts. Skip this if your compliance program is already running lean with minimal control volume, or if you need deep detection and response capabilities; Cypago is built for the control validation layer, not threat hunting. Mid-market and enterprise teams managing hybrid infrastructure need Fortra Tripwire Enterprise because it handles file integrity monitoring and configuration drift across on-premises and cloud without requiring separate tooling for each environment. The platform's automatic cloud asset onboarding, role-based remediation workflows, and continuous compliance monitoring align directly with NIST DE.CM and PR.PS requirements, and the centralized console actually reduces alert fatigue compared to bolting together point solutions. Skip this if your organization is still stabilizing basic log aggregation; Tripwire assumes you already know what you're looking for and need speed on remediation, not help building your monitoring baseline.