CYE Hyver vs NopSec CTEM: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
CYE Hyver is a commercial exposure management tool by CYE. NopSec CTEM is a commercial exposure management tool by NopSec. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best exposure management fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Mid-market and enterprise security leaders who need to justify remediation budgets to the CFO should start with CYE Hyver. It translates exposure into dollar figures and attack routes into priority sequences, then maps mitigation costs back to business impact, which turns "patch this vulnerability" into "fixing this costs $50K and prevents a $2M breach scenario." The platform covers NIST risk assessment and asset management thoroughly while staying light on response and recovery functions, so it's strongest as a front-end exposure quantification tool rather than an incident readiness platform. Skip this if your team is still learning basic vulnerability management fundamentals; Hyver assumes you have inventory discipline already.
Mid-market and enterprise teams drowning in scanner output will gain immediate traction with NopSec CTEM because its machine learning prioritization actually eliminates the noise instead of just ranking it. The platform aggregates findings across multiple scanner types and enforces SLAs on remediation, which means you move from "we scanned everything" to "we fixed what matters," covering NIST ID.RA and ID.IM functions that most tools leave half-done. Skip this if your organization has fewer than 50 security personnel or runs a single vulnerability scanner; the real value unlocks when you're managing sprawl across dozens of tools and need remediation automation tied to ticketing workflows.
