CyberQP QGuard vs Silverfort Privileged Access Security: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

CyberQP QGuard

Mid-market and enterprise teams drowning in standing admin access will find QGuard's elimination of persistent credentials actually reduces your attack surface instead of just monitoring it. Support for CMMC 2.0 and NIST 800-53 means you're already aligned with compliance frameworks that demand least privilege, and the JIT model forces credential rotation that breaks the assumed-breach scenario. Skip this if your org treats PAM as a checkbox tool; QGuard requires commitment to revoking standing rights, which means harder conversations with infrastructure teams before deployment.

Silverfort Privileged Access Security

Mid-market and enterprise security teams drowning in unmanaged service accounts and shadow admins should pick Silverfort Privileged Access Security for its agentless discovery that actually finds what you've forgotten exists, then enforces least privilege without requiring vault infrastructure or proxy deployment. The platform maps directly to NIST PR.AA and ID.AM controls, and its inline validation of access requests means you're blocking violations in real time, not auditing them later. Skip this if your privileged access problem is mostly about managing a handful of documented admin accounts; Silverfort's value multiplies with environmental complexity and account sprawl.