Cyber adAPT vs Exabeam NetMon: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Cyber adAPT is a commercial network detection and response tool by Cyber adAPT. Exabeam NetMon is a commercial network detection and response tool by Exabeam. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best network detection and response fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Mid-market and enterprise security teams drowning in false positives from signature-based NDR will see immediate relief from Cyber adAPT's behavior-based detection, which works at line speed without requiring tuning for your specific network. It covers both NIST DE.CM continuous monitoring and DE.AE adverse event analysis, meaning you get detection and initial analysis baked in without the EDR tax. Skip this if you need correlation across endpoints and network in a single pane; Cyber adAPT prioritizes what happens on the wire, not what happens on hosts.
Mid-market and enterprise security ops teams that struggle to spot lateral movement and data exfiltration in encrypted traffic should prioritize Exabeam NetMon. Its network traffic analysis catches what endpoint tools miss, and the dual NIST coverage in Continuous Monitoring and Adverse Event Analysis shows real depth in both detection and investigation. Skip this if your network is mostly cloud-native with minimal east-west traffic; NetMon assumes a hybrid environment where network packets still tell the story.
