CurlSek Intelligence Suite vs Ironwood Cyber Enlight: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

CurlSek Intelligence Suite

Development teams shipping web applications and APIs need continuous pentesting that actually integrates into CI/CD without requiring manual test scheduling; CurlSek Intelligence Suite's autonomous AI agents run on every commit and flag exploitable vulnerabilities before production. The platform covers both ID.RA risk assessment and PR.PS platform security through its domain-specialized testing pods and compliance monitoring for SOC 2, ISO 27001, and PCI DSS. Skip this if your primary concern is post-incident forensics or you need deep incident response workflows, since the tool prioritizes vulnerability discovery over RS.AN investigation depth.

Ironwood Cyber Enlight

Security teams responsible for validating whether their network can actually resist lateral movement and privilege escalation should run Ironwood Cyber Enlight; it simulates the full attack chain autonomously rather than stopping at vulnerability discovery. The platform covers ID.RA and DE.AE functions well, but NIST RS.AN (incident analysis and forensics) sits outside its scope, meaning it's built for continuous attack simulation and remediation validation, not incident response integration. Skip this if you need a tool that hunts active compromises or correlates findings across your existing detection stack.