ConventionEngine vs GLIMPS Fortress: 2026 Comparison
ConventionEngine is a free threat hunting tool. GLIMPS Fortress is a commercial threat hunting tool by GLIMPS. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best threat hunting fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, integrations, company size fit, here is our conclusion:
Threat hunters working with Windows malware samples will find ConventionEngine useful for fast-path filtering of PE files before deeper analysis; PDB path inspection catches lazy packers and stolen toolchains that slip past signature-based detection. The tool is free and maintained on GitHub with a clear rule set that requires no licensing overhead. Skip this if you need automated hunting at scale or integration with your EDR; ConventionEngine works best as a manual triage layer for analysts who already have samples in hand.
Mid-market and enterprise security teams managing thousands of binaries across distributed repositories need GLIMPS Fortress to catch zero-days and supply-chain threats that slip past initial scans. Its retrohunting engine automatically reapplies new detection rules across your entire historical file archive, surfacing infections missed on first ingestion; the 25-engine analysis stack and Kubernetes architecture handle 1M+ files daily without slowdown. Skip this if your threat hunting is purely network-focused or if you lack the ops bandwidth to tune reanalysis frequency and manage an on-premises deployment; Fortress demands active curation to justify its cost.
