Alpine Security Threat Detection vs GLIMPS Fortress: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Alpine Security Threat Detection

Mid-market and enterprise security teams with mature EDR deployments should pick Alpine Security Threat Detection when you need active hunting that actually correlates across your existing tools instead of running parallel to them. The service covers DE.AE and RS.AN functions at the NIST level, meaning they're built to find what your EDR misses and move quickly into forensics, not just flag alerts for your team to triage. Skip this if you're looking for a standalone platform or need heavy automation; this is a managed hunting service that assumes you already have security infrastructure in place and want humans who know how to exploit EDR data for detection.

GLIMPS Fortress

Mid-market and enterprise security teams managing thousands of binaries across distributed repositories need GLIMPS Fortress to catch zero-days and supply-chain threats that slip past initial scans. Its retrohunting engine automatically reapplies new detection rules across your entire historical file archive, surfacing infections missed on first ingestion; the 25-engine analysis stack and Kubernetes architecture handle 1M+ files daily without slowdown. Skip this if your threat hunting is purely network-focused or if you lack the ops bandwidth to tune reanalysis frequency and manage an on-premises deployment; Fortress demands active curation to justify its cost.