Cohesive VNS3 Cloud Firewall vs Fortinet Secure Networking: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Cohesive VNS3 Cloud Firewall

Mid-market teams managing multi-cloud infrastructure will get the most from Cohesive VNS3 Cloud Firewall because it actually handles network segmentation and transit routing without forcing you into a single vendor's ecosystem. The containerized plugin architecture and multi-cloud deployment support mean you're not rearchitecting when you move workloads between AWS, Azure, or on-premises; NIST PR.AA coverage confirms granular access control across those boundaries. Skip this if you need a managed service with minimal operational overhead; VNS3 demands hands-on network configuration and assumes your team understands IPsec and policy enforcement.

Fortinet Secure Networking

Mid-market and enterprise security teams managing hybrid networks with SD-WAN deployments should pick Fortinet Secure Networking because it actually consolidates firewall, access control, and threat detection into one pane instead of bolting them together later. The platform covers eight NIST CSF 2.0 functions across both prevention and response, with particular strength in continuous monitoring and incident management, so you're not betting the farm on detection alone. Skip this if your primary need is cloud-native workload security; Fortinet's architecture assumes your perimeter still matters, which it does for most organizations but not all.