Cognito Scanner vs GCPBucketBrute: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Cognito Scanner is a free penetration testing tool. GCPBucketBrute is a free penetration testing tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best penetration testing fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
AWS security teams testing Cognito deployments should use Cognito Scanner because it catches account enumeration and privilege escalation flaws that managed AWS security tools routinely miss. At 109 GitHub stars with zero cost, it's the only tool built specifically to attack Cognito's auth mechanics rather than treating identity as a checkbox in a broader AWS scanner. Skip this if your threat model doesn't include internal or compromised-credential scenarios; Cognito Scanner assumes attackers already have network access and focuses on what they can do once inside.
Penetration testers auditing Google Cloud environments need GCPBucketBrute to quickly surface misconfigurations that automated scanners routinely miss. With 558 GitHub stars and active community use, the tool's enumeration logic catches overly permissive bucket policies faster than manual checks or generic cloud scanners. Skip this if your team lacks GCP infrastructure or needs post-exploitation privilege mapping; GCPBucketBrute is strictly a reconnaissance and access-validation tool, not a full exploitation framework.
