CloudMask End-to-End Encryption is a commercial email encryption solution by CloudMask. Egress Protect is a commercial email encryption solution by Egress. Features, integrations, deployment and the company behind each one, side by side.
E2EE solution for emails, files & SaaS apps with user-held encryption keys.
End-to-end email encryption with DLP and access controls for Microsoft 365
See more solutions in this category, or build a security stack from your picks.
Based on what each listing shows: deployment, company size, price and open source.
CloudMask End-to-End Encryption fits if you want a cloud product.
Egress Protect fits if you need both cloud and on-premises options and you are a small business.
Common questions when comparing CloudMask End-to-End Encryption vs Egress Protect for email encryption.
CloudMask End-to-End Encryption: E2EE solution for emails, files & SaaS apps with user-held encryption keys, built by CloudMask.
Egress Protect: End-to-end email encryption with DLP and access controls for Microsoft 365, built by Egress.
The table above shows where their features, integrations, deployment and company size fit differ.
CloudMask End-to-End Encryption is made by CloudMask. Egress Protect is made by Egress. The vendor behind a product decides its roadmap, support, and longevity, so check each company's profile before you commit.
Often, yes. CloudMask End-to-End Encryption and Egress Protect are both Email Encryption products, and both cover Encryption. Use the table above to see where features, deployment and company size fit differ.
No Email Encryption shortlist yet. This is the closest one.
Updated 2026-11-01
See the shortlist
