CloudCopy vs barq: 2026 Comparison
CloudCopy is a free offensive security tool. barq is a free offensive security tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best offensive security fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Red teamers and penetration testers targeting AWS environments with on-premises Active Directory should use CloudCopy to extract domain credentials from cloud-hosted domain controllers without agent deployment or credential interception. The tool's implementation of the Shadow Copy attack via EBS snapshots works against a specific, high-value target that most cloud offense tooling ignores. Skip this if your scope excludes AWS infrastructure or if you're looking for post-exploitation credential access beyond domain hashes.
Red team operators and cloud security engineers testing AWS infrastructure will find barq invaluable for post-exploitation scenarios that standard tooling can't reach, particularly lateral movement across EC2 instances without relying on SSH keypairs or stored credentials. The 387 GitHub stars and active exploitation framework design signal serious adoption among practitioners who need to validate AWS misconfigurations that detection tools often miss. Skip this if your team runs only managed AWS services or lacks the operational maturity to safely sandbox post-exploitation activity; barq assumes you already control initial access and know what you're doing with the blast radius.
