What is the difference between Cloud Storage Security Antivirus vs HAWK?

**Cloud Storage Security Antivirus**: In-tenant malware scanning for AWS, Azure & GCP object storage. built by Cloud Storage Security. Core capabilities include Multi-engine malware detection for cloud object storage, Real-time scanning of new uploads triggered by storage events, Scheduled batch scanning of existing and archived objects.. **HAWK**: HAWK is a multi-cloud antivirus scanning API that uses CLAMAV and YARA engines to detect malware in AWS S3, Azure Blob Storage, and GCP Cloud Storage objects.. Both serve the Cloud-Native Application Protection Platform market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.

Is Cloud Storage Security Antivirus a good alternative to HAWK?

Cloud Storage Security Antivirus and HAWK serve similar Cloud-Native Application Protection Platform use cases: both are Cloud-Native Application Protection Platform tools, both cover Azure, GCP, S3. Key differences: Cloud Storage Security Antivirus is Commercial while HAWK is Free, HAWK is open-source. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.

Cloud Storage Security Antivirus vs HAWK: Features, Integrations, Reviews (2026) | CybersecTools

Cloud Storage Security Antivirus vs HAWK: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.

Cloud Storage Security Antivirus is a commercial cloud-native application protection platform tool by Cloud Storage Security. HAWK is a free cloud-native application protection platform tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best cloud-native application protection platform fit for your security stack.

CST Verdict

Based on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, integrations, company size fit, here is our conclusion:

Cloud Storage Security Antivirus

Mid-market and enterprise teams storing sensitive data across AWS, Azure, and GCP need Cloud Storage Security Antivirus because it scans object storage at rest without agents or complex integrations, catching malware that bucket-level access controls miss. Multi-engine detection triggered by storage events means new uploads are scanned before they sit exposed, and automated quarantine policies enforce response without manual triage. Not ideal for organizations primarily concerned with data exfiltration or access anomalies; this tool prioritizes malware detection and incident containment, not the continuous monitoring and forensic analysis needed for insider threat or data movement investigations.

HAWK

Teams scanning cloud object storage for malware in multi-cloud environments should use HAWK for its API-first design that integrates directly into S3, Blob Storage, and Cloud Storage ingestion pipelines without agents or sidecars. The dual-engine approach using CLAMAV and YARA signatures catches both known malware and custom indicators, which is why it's genuinely useful for detecting compromised uploads before they propagate. Skip HAWK if you need behavioral detection or threat hunting; it's signature-based scanning only, so zero-days and polymorphic malware will slip through.