Clearnetwork ContentCatcher vs MX Layer Email Security: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Clearnetwork ContentCatcher

Mid-market and enterprise teams drowning in phishing and ransomware attachments need ContentCatcher for its system emulation-based attachment scanning, which catches malware that signature-based filters let through. The platform covers the full DLP and encryption chain,SSN detection, credit card masking, encrypted delivery,so you're not bolting on three separate tools. Skip this if your organization needs advanced threat hunting or forensic depth; ContentCatcher prioritizes blocking and continuity over investigation, which is fine if your SOC is lean and your email volume is high.

MX Layer Email Security

Startups and SMBs overwhelmed by phishing and credential theft should consider MX Layer Email Security for its AI-powered filtering that catches polymorphic threats without the overhead of larger platforms. The platform covers the full NIST Detect and Respond spectrum, with continuous monitoring and adverse event analysis built in, which matters when your security team is understaffed. Skip this if you need deep integration with your existing SIEM or require advanced forensics; MX Layer's strength is speed of deployment and operational simplicity, not investigative depth.