Cigent SSD UxV vs Secturion DarkStor (DARE): Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Cigent SSD UxV: CSfC-aligned encrypted SSD solution for data-at-rest protection on UxV platforms. built by Cigent. Core capabilities include AES-256 hardware full-drive encryption (TCG Opal 2.0, FIPS 140-2), Software Full Drive Encryption (FDE) as a second CSfC DAR layer, Pre-Boot Authentication (PBA) to enforce encryption before OS load..

Secturion DarkStor (DARE): Hardware-based network data-at-rest encryptors for defense networks. built by Secturion. Core capabilities include Hardware-based in-line network storage encryption, Supports data rates up to 100 Gbps with ultra-low latency, OS, software, and database agnostic operation..

Both serve the Data Security Posture Management market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.

Cigent SSD UxV differentiates with AES-256 hardware full-drive encryption (TCG Opal 2.0, FIPS 140-2), Software Full Drive Encryption (FDE) as a second CSfC DAR layer, Pre-Boot Authentication (PBA) to enforce encryption before OS load. Secturion DarkStor (DARE) differentiates with Hardware-based in-line network storage encryption, Supports data rates up to 100 Gbps with ultra-low latency, OS, software, and database agnostic operation.

Cigent SSD UxV is developed by Cigent. Secturion DarkStor (DARE) is developed by Secturion. Vendor maturity, funding stage, and team size can be important factors when evaluating long-term viability and support quality.

Cigent SSD UxV and Secturion DarkStor (DARE) serve similar Data Security Posture Management use cases: both are Data Security Posture Management tools, both cover Hardware Security, Physical Security. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.