Checkmarx Container Security vs Deepfence YaraHunter: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Checkmarx Container Security

Teams shipping containers through fast-moving CI/CD pipelines need Checkmarx Container Security because it catches exploitable vulnerabilities by correlating image scans with runtime behavior, not just flagging every CVE that exists. The Docker Extension integration means scanning happens where developers actually work, and the layer-level visibility lets you pinpoint exactly which base image caused the problem. Skip this if you need runtime security without the image scanning component; Checkmarx assumes you're managing both sides of the container lifecycle.

Deepfence YaraHunter

SMB and mid-market teams with container-heavy infrastructure need YaraHunter for malware detection that actually integrates into CI/CD without slowing the pipeline; rule caching and Docker socket integration let you scan at build time and runtime without reinventing your workflow. The tool maps directly to NIST ID.RA and DE.CM, meaning you're getting risk assessment and continuous monitoring without the overhead of larger platforms. Skip this if you need runtime behavior analysis or post-exploitation detection; YaraHunter is signature-based and won't catch zero-days or lateral movement inside containers.