Charlotte vs Donut: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros and cons, compared head to head.
Charlotte is a free red-team & adversary emulation tool. Donut is a free red-team & adversary emulation tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best red-team & adversary emulation fit for your security stack. Independent and vendor-neutral: we never sell rankings.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Red teamers and penetration testers who need reliable shellcode execution without triggering EDR will find Charlotte indispensable; its C++ implementation and undetected status across major security stacks give you consistent command execution where batch scripts and PowerShell fail. The 979 GitHub stars reflect active maintenance and real-world validation from operators who depend on it. This is not for blue teams or organizations evaluating defensive tools; Charlotte is purpose-built for offense and makes no attempt to hide that.
Red teamers and penetration testers who need to deliver .NET and PE payloads that evade memory-scanning EDR will find Donut essential; it generates position-independent shellcode that executes directly from memory without touching disk, eliminating the most common detection vector. With 4,492 GitHub stars and active community contributions, the tool has been battle-tested across real engagements and stays current with Windows API changes. Skip this if you're looking for post-exploitation frameworks with built-in C2 capability or if your scope is limited to external reconnaissance; Donut is narrowly focused on the injection problem and assumes you already have payload delivery sorted.
