Charles Web Debugging Proxy vs Kansa: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Charles Web Debugging Proxy is a free incident response tool. Kansa is a free incident response tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best incident response fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Developers and security teams debugging API integrations or investigating client-side data leakage will find Charles Web Debugging Proxy invaluable because it intercepts and decrypts HTTPS traffic at the proxy layer, exposing what sanitized logs never will. The tool runs on Windows, macOS, and Linux with zero agent deployment friction, making it immediately useful for incident response when you need to see exactly what's crossing the wire. Skip this if your team needs automated threat detection or network-wide visibility; Charles is a manual inspection tool for the engineer who knows what they're looking for.
Incident response teams with Windows-heavy environments and existing PowerShell expertise should use Kansa to rapidly collect forensic artifacts across multiple machines without deploying agents. The 1,639 GitHub stars and active community contributions signal stable tooling that's been battle-tested in real breaches. Skip this if your team lacks PowerShell fluency or needs GUI-driven workflows; Kansa is built for analysts comfortable scripting their own modules and interpreting raw artifacts, not point-and-click incident response.
