Cato SSE 360 vs StratoKey Cloud Access Security Broker (CASB): Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Short answer

Mid-market and enterprise teams replacing point security tools with a single cloud-native platform will get the most from Cato SSE 360, especially if WAN optimization and traffic steering matter as much as threat prevention. Its Single Pass Cloud Engine processes SWG, CASB, DLP, and ZTNA inspection in one pass across a private global backbone, cutting both latency and policy complexity. Skip this if your organization needs depth in DLP fingerprinting or forensic recovery; Cato prioritizes access control and continuous monitoring over data loss investigation. Mid-market and enterprise teams protecting regulated data in SaaS applications should consider StratoKey Cloud Access Security Broker for its gateway-based encryption that tokenizes data before it reaches Salesforce, ServiceNow, and similar platforms, preventing exposure at the application layer itself. The tool holds FIPS 140-3 validated libraries and enforces group policy-based decryption control, which directly addresses PR.AA and PR.DS under NIST CSF 2.0. Skip this if you need visibility into threats after compromise or incident response automation; StratoKey prioritizes prevention and access control, not detection or recovery workflows.