Cato SSE 360 vs Netskope One Threat Protection: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Cato SSE 360

Mid-market and enterprise teams replacing point security tools with a single cloud-native platform will get the most from Cato SSE 360, especially if WAN optimization and traffic steering matter as much as threat prevention. Its Single Pass Cloud Engine processes SWG, CASB, DLP, and ZTNA inspection in one pass across a private global backbone, cutting both latency and policy complexity. Skip this if your organization needs depth in DLP fingerprinting or forensic recovery; Cato prioritizes access control and continuous monitoring over data loss investigation.

Netskope One Threat Protection

Mid-market and enterprise teams replacing legacy web gateways will see immediate ROI from Netskope One Threat Protection's inline malware detection; the multistage sandboxing across 30+ file types with heuristic deobfuscation catches polymorph and obfuscated attacks that signature-only tools miss. The retrohunt API and patient zero protection mean you're not just blocking today's threats but hunting backwards through your traffic for files you've already seen, mapping NIST DE.CM and DE.AE functions that most SSE platforms treat as afterthoughts. Skip this if your threat lab has time to manually analyze suspicious files or if you need equally strong recovery and response capabilities; Netskope prioritizes detection and forensics over incident response orchestration.