Cato Networks Cato SASE vs Netskope One SASE: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Cato Networks Cato SASE

Mid-market and enterprise teams replacing separate SD-WAN and security appliances will see immediate ROI from Cato Networks Cato SASE because its global private backbone eliminates the performance tax that plague legacy hub-and-spoke networks. The platform covers five critical NIST functions (Platform Security, Identity Management, Data Security, Infrastructure Resilience, and Continuous Monitoring), though it tilts toward prevention and detection over incident response and recovery workflows. Skip this if your organization needs deep DLP customization or runs primarily on-premises infrastructure; Cato's strength is cloud-native operations where connectivity and security converge.

Netskope One SASE

Mid-market and enterprise security teams replacing point products with a single cloud-native platform will find Netskope One SASE's direct internet access model cuts latency that traditional hub-and-spoke architectures create. Its coverage of PR.AA and PR.DS under NIST CSF 2.0, combined with native SD-WAN integration, means you're not bolting together separate vendors for access control and branch connectivity. Skip this if your organization needs deep on-premise inspection capabilities or runs primarily on private MPLS networks; Netskope assumes you're cloud-forward and willing to shift traffic patterns away from legacy hub models.