Catalyst SOAR vs UpGuard Risk Automations: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Catalyst SOAR is a free security orchestration automation and response tool. UpGuard Risk Automations is a commercial security orchestration automation and response tool by UpGuard. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best security orchestration automation and response fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Teams with limited security budgets who need alert triage and playbook automation without vendor lock-in should start with Catalyst SOAR; the open source model means you own your workflows and can fork the codebase if the project stalls. Free pricing removes the friction of pilot projects that plague SOAR adoption at smaller organizations. Skip this if your team needs pre-built playbooks for your specific tech stack out of the box; Catalyst requires you to map your own alert sources and build integrations, which demands engineering overhead that stretches thin SOCs can't absorb.
Security teams drowning in alerts across 90+ disconnected tools need UpGuard Risk Automations to stop chasing noise and start fixing actual risk. It integrates your existing stack,EDR, vulnerability scanners, cloud posture tools,into one automated triage engine that filters signal from noise, then pushes remediation directly to the system level without manual handoff. The tool prioritizes continuous monitoring and remediation (NIST DE.CM and RS.MI) over incident response, so it's built for prevention rather than forensics. Skip this if your team wants a security operations center platform or if you're still evaluating which tools to buy; UpGuard assumes your tooling is already in place and needs orchestration.
