C3M Cloud Control - CSPM vs Google Cloud Security: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

C3M Cloud Control - CSPM

Mid-market and enterprise security teams managing AWS, GCP, and Azure in parallel should pick C3M Cloud Control for its agentless inventory and native policy engine that doesn't require a separate query language learning curve. The CQL engine lets you write custom detection rules without external dependencies, and the SOAR-based automation actually closes the gap between detection and response instead of dumping alerts into a backlog. Skip this if you need deep API-level CIEM capabilities or forensic depth comparable to point tools; C3M prioritizes continuous misconfiguration hunting over identity entitlement analysis and historical breach archaeology.

Google Cloud Security

Organizations already committed to Google Cloud Platform will find Google Cloud Security valuable for enforcing zero-trust access and compliance controls across workloads without rip-and-replace; the integrated BeyondCorp Enterprise, VPC Service Controls, and Assured Workloads stack means access decisions and data perimeters are built into your cloud architecture rather than bolted on afterward. The platform covers nine NIST CSF 2.0 functions including strong Identity Management and Continuous Monitoring capabilities, with Security Command Center providing native visibility into threats across GCP services. Skip this if you're multi-cloud and need vendor-agnostic CSPM, or if you're still evaluating whether to commit to GCP; the tooling assumes you've already made that decision.