Burp-LFI-tests vs SecLists: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Burp-LFI-tests is a free penetration testing tool. SecLists is a free penetration testing tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best penetration testing fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Penetration testers who need to systematically test for Local File Inclusion flaws will find Burp-LFI-tests valuable because it consolidates proven LFI payloads and exploitation chains into a Burp extension, cutting manual payload crafting time during assessments. The tool is free and maintained on GitHub with solid community engagement, removing cost friction from your toolkit. This is not a replacement for manual testing or general vulnerability scanning; it's narrowly built for LFI-focused work, so teams expecting broad web vulnerability coverage or automated exploitation should look elsewhere.
Penetration testers and red teamers running tight assessment schedules should use SecLists as their payload and wordlist baseline; the 69,513 GitHub stars reflect active community curation that beats rolling your own lists from scratch. You get fuzz patterns, credential combinations, and web shell payloads organized by attack vector, which cuts reconnaissance time significantly compared to scattered public sources. Skip this if your team needs a commercial SaaS interface with vendor support or automated payload generation; SecLists is raw material that demands you know how to apply it.
