Burp-LFI-tests vs RsaCtfTool: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Burp-LFI-tests is a free penetration testing tool. RsaCtfTool is a free penetration testing tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best penetration testing fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Penetration testers who need to systematically test for Local File Inclusion flaws will find Burp-LFI-tests valuable because it consolidates proven LFI payloads and exploitation chains into a Burp extension, cutting manual payload crafting time during assessments. The tool is free and maintained on GitHub with solid community engagement, removing cost friction from your toolkit. This is not a replacement for manual testing or general vulnerability scanning; it's narrowly built for LFI-focused work, so teams expecting broad web vulnerability coverage or automated exploitation should look elsewhere.
Penetration testers and security researchers validating RSA implementations should reach for RsaCtfTool when you need to quickly expose weak key generation in legacy systems; its multi-algorithm factorization approach catches common mistakes that single-method tools miss. With 6,830 GitHub stars and active community contributions, it's the go-to for CTF competitions and authorized assessments of systems you control. Skip this if you're looking for a general cryptanalysis platform covering symmetric ciphers or modern elliptic curve vulnerabilities; RsaCtfTool is RSA-specific and won't help there.
