Burp-LFI-tests vs FDsploit: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Burp-LFI-tests is a free penetration testing tool. FDsploit is a free penetration testing tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best penetration testing fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Penetration testers who need to systematically test for Local File Inclusion flaws will find Burp-LFI-tests valuable because it consolidates proven LFI payloads and exploitation chains into a Burp extension, cutting manual payload crafting time during assessments. The tool is free and maintained on GitHub with solid community engagement, removing cost friction from your toolkit. This is not a replacement for manual testing or general vulnerability scanning; it's narrowly built for LFI-focused work, so teams expecting broad web vulnerability coverage or automated exploitation should look elsewhere.
Penetration testers running manual assessments against monolithic web applications will find FDsploit valuable for automating the tedious work of chaining file inclusion and directory traversal checks across parameter fuzzing. At 272 GitHub stars with active commit history, the tool has enough community validation to trust its exploitation logic without hand-rolling Python scripts yourself. Skip this if your scope includes modern APIs, microservices, or frameworks with built-in path normalization; FDsploit targets legacy code patterns that automated DAST tools often miss, which is exactly why it exists.
