Brute Ratel C4 vs pybof: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Brute Ratel C4 is a free offensive security tool. pybof is a free offensive security tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best offensive security fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Red teams and penetration testers running multi-stage campaigns will prefer Brute Ratel C4 for its modular payload architecture and API-driven automation, which cut orchestration overhead compared to monolithic frameworks. The tool's memory-only execution and reflective DLL injection reduce forensic artifacts significantly, making it harder for detection teams to recover post-engagement indicators. Skip it if your primary need is a commercial support contract or compliance-friendly audit trails; Brute Ratel C4 is open-source and built for operators who know their target environment intimately.
Red teamers and penetration testers who need to execute custom BOFs without touching disk will find PyBOF essential for post-exploitation work; it's the only Python-native option for in-memory Beacon Object File execution, letting you skip Cobalt Strike's GUI entirely and automate payloads programmatically. The 80 GitHub stars and active maintenance signal real adoption among operators, not just theoretical interest. Skip this if you're looking for evasion magic; PyBOF assumes you've already got execution and focuses narrowly on loading and running BOFs, which means your success depends entirely on the quality of the BOF itself and your network position.
