Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Bowtie Zero Trust Network Access is a commercial zero trust network access tool by Bowtie. Soliton Systems G/On is a commercial zero trust network access tool by Soliton Systems. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best zero trust network access fit for your security stack.
Based on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Bowtie Zero Trust Network Access
Security teams managing distributed workforces across multiple cloud regions should prioritize Bowtie Zero Trust Network Access for its refusal to backhaul traffic through centralized gateways, which eliminates the bottleneck that tanks performance in traditional ZTNA deployments. The distributed control plane runs entirely on your infrastructure, not Bowtie's, and WireGuard encryption keeps private keys out of vendor hands, addressing the NIST PR.AA identity and access control requirement without trust dependency. This isn't for buyers seeking integrated secure web gateway capabilities from a single vendor; Bowtie's on-device SWG component is functional but plays second fiddle to its network access core.
Mid-market and enterprise teams replacing VPN with zero-trust remote access will find G/On's USB-key client the least disruptive path; no installation means adoption friction drops on unmanaged devices, and the portable form factor solves the "what if I switch laptops" problem that software-only SDP solutions create. Three NIST CSF 2.0 coverage areas including PR.AA and continuous monitoring reflect legitimate identity and access control enforcement. Skip this if your workforce needs clientless browser-based access or your risk model demands agent-based endpoint telemetry; G/On prioritizes network segmentation over visibility into device posture.
ZTNA platform with direct device-to-resource encrypted access via WireGuard.
VPN-alternative SDP providing zero-trust secure remote access via USB key.
Access NIST CSF 2.0 data from thousands of security products via MCP to assess your stack coverage.
Access via MCPNo reviews yet
No reviews yet
Explore more tools in this category or create a security stack with your selections.
Common questions about comparing Bowtie Zero Trust Network Access vs Soliton Systems G/On for your zero trust network access needs.
Bowtie Zero Trust Network Access: ZTNA platform with direct device-to-resource encrypted access via WireGuard. built by Bowtie. Core capabilities include Direct device-to-resource encrypted tunneling without backhauling through middleman networks, On-device policy enforcement for authentication, encryption, and access control, Distributed Secure Web Gateway (SWG) with on-device web filtering..
Soliton Systems G/On: VPN-alternative SDP providing zero-trust secure remote access via USB key. built by Soliton Systems. Core capabilities include Software-defined perimeter replacing VPN connections, Zero-trust access policy allowing only verified users, Portable USB key-based client requiring no installation..
Both serve the Zero Trust Network Access market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.
Bowtie Zero Trust Network Access differentiates with Direct device-to-resource encrypted tunneling without backhauling through middleman networks, On-device policy enforcement for authentication, encryption, and access control, Distributed Secure Web Gateway (SWG) with on-device web filtering. Soliton Systems G/On differentiates with Software-defined perimeter replacing VPN connections, Zero-trust access policy allowing only verified users, Portable USB key-based client requiring no installation.
Bowtie Zero Trust Network Access is developed by Bowtie. Soliton Systems G/On is developed by Soliton Systems. Vendor maturity, funding stage, and team size can be important factors when evaluating long-term viability and support quality.
Bowtie Zero Trust Network Access and Soliton Systems G/On serve similar Zero Trust Network Access use cases: both are Zero Trust Network Access tools, both cover ZTNA. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.
Get strategic cybersecurity insights in your inbox