Blue Ridge Networks LinkGuard vs Portnox CORE: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Blue Ridge Networks LinkGuard

Mid-market and enterprise security teams defending distributed workforces should consider LinkGuard for its network micro-segmentation paired with cellular-aware remote access, a combination most NAC vendors skip. The vendor covers all four NIST CSF 2.0 categories from access control through continuous monitoring, and the quantum-resilience encryption layer adds genuine future-proofing against data harvesting attacks. Skip this if your priority is visibility into east-west traffic anomalies; LinkGuard emphasizes enforcement and asset obfuscation over the detection analytics that catch lateral movement in real time.

Portnox CORE

Mid-market and enterprise teams managing mixed device environments,wired, wireless, IoT, BYOD,should run Portnox CORE if agentless discovery and fast containment matter more than post-breach forensics. The software-based deployment eliminates hardware appliance sprawl, and the vendor-agnostic architecture actually works across legacy and modern networks without forcing rip-and-replace decisions. Skip this if your priority is continuous monitoring after compromise or if you need deep behavioral analytics; Portnox is built for asset discovery and access denial, not threat hunting or extended detection.