Beyond Identity Phishing-Resistant MFA vs Identity Platform: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Beyond Identity Phishing-Resistant MFA

Startups and mid-market companies tired of phishing attacks against SMS and TOTP codes should build their access layer around Beyond Identity Phishing-Resistant MFA, which eliminates those fallback factors entirely through cryptographic key-based authentication tied to device trust. The platform covers NIST PR.AA (identity and access control) and DE.CM (continuous monitoring) without requiring you to bolt on separate device posture tools; Intune and CrowdStrike integration handles that natively. Skip this if your organization relies heavily on legacy applications that can't handle modern authentication protocols or if you need deep SSO analytics beyond basic provisioning.

Identity Platform

Mid-market and enterprise security teams replacing password-dependent systems will get the most from Identity Platform because its passwordless architecture with location-based enforcement actually stops phishing attacks rather than just detecting them. The platform covers NIST PR.AA and DE.CM with mutual authentication and automated threat blocking, cutting out the manual response lag that kills other MFA deployments. Skip this if you need deep integration with legacy on-premises systems or require a vendor with 500+ employees; Ironchip's 34-person team and cloud-only model mean you're betting on European scaling and may hit gaps in support during US peak hours.