Beetles CrowdSpark Platform vs Sysreptor: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Beetles CrowdSpark Platform is a commercial penetration testing tool by Beetles Cyber Security. Sysreptor is a free penetration testing tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best penetration testing fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Mid-market and SMB security teams running continuous pentest programs will benefit most from CrowdSpark's engagement management layer, which collapses pentest cycle time by bundling scheduling, reporting, and remediation verification into one platform rather than email threads and spreadsheets. The real-time alerting for critical findings and API integration into CI/CD pipelines addresses the NIST ID.RA and DE.CM functions that most organizations leave disconnected from their development workflow. Skip this if you need pentest provider selection or deep vulnerability scanning; CrowdSpark assumes you've already chosen your pentest vendor and just need to operationalize the testing cadence and findings.
Pentesters and red teamers running small-to-mid engagements will get the most from Sysreptor because it cuts reporting time in half through templates you actually customize instead of fighting vendor presets. The free pricing and 2,387 GitHub stars signal a tool maintained by practitioners who understand that writing findings matters more than collecting scan data. Skip this if your firm needs integrated vulnerability scanning or automated client delivery workflows; Sysreptor assumes you're generating your own raw findings and want to own how they're presented.
