bap vs VerySimpleHoneypot: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
bap is a free honeypots & deception tool. VerySimpleHoneypot is a free honeypots & deception tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best honeypots & deception fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Security teams running legacy applications or internal services that still rely on HTTP basic auth will find bap's value in its simplicity: deploy a lightweight honeypot, collect real credential attempts, and feed that signal into incident response workflows without managing infrastructure. At 54 GitHub stars with zero dependencies, it's genuinely frictionless to stand up alongside existing apps. Skip this if you're looking for sophisticated multi-stage deception or you've already migrated to modern auth; bap does one thing and punts everything else to your monitoring layer.
Security teams running resource-constrained labs or proof-of-concept deployments will appreciate VerySimpleHoneypot's straightforward approach to threat interaction logging; it does one thing,capture attacker behavior without complexity,and does it free. The customizable service emulation and low barrier to entry make it useful for analysts who need to see what adversaries actually do before investing in production deception infrastructure. Skip this if you need centralized management across dozens of honeypots or automated threat intelligence extraction; VerySimpleHoneypot is a learning tool, not an enterprise detection multiplier.
