AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs Xopero ONE MSP Backup: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is a free backup as a service tool. Xopero ONE MSP Backup is a commercial backup as a service tool by Xopero Software. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best backup as a service fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Teams running mission-critical applications on AWS who need sub-hour recovery times without buying dedicated disaster recovery infrastructure should start here; AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery eliminates the capital expense of standby hardware by recovering directly into AWS at scale, and the free tier lets you test failover before committing. The service handles continuous replication of on-premises and cloud servers, so your RTO is limited by your network throughput, not your backup window. Skip this if your applications live outside AWS or if you need orchestrated failover across multiple cloud regions; Elastic Disaster Recovery is AWS-centric by design.
MSPs managing backup across dozens of customer environments need a platform that doesn't force per-tenant license negotiation, and Xopero ONE MSP Backup eliminates that friction through per-GB pay-as-you-go pricing and automatic license transfer between customers. The centralized console handles unlimited storage locations and hybrid cloud-plus-on-premise deployments without separate integrations, letting you bill customers independently while maintaining one operational view. Skip this if your recovery posture depends on detection-layer incident response; Xopero maps cleanly to NIST RC.RP recovery execution but has thinner coverage across proactive threat detection, meaning you'll need a separate tool for breach forensics and containment.
