AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs Trilio: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros and cons, compared head to head.
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is a free backup as a service tool. Trilio is a commercial backup as a service tool by Trilio. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best backup as a service fit for your security stack. Independent and vendor-neutral: our scores and rankings are earned, never bought — sponsored placement is always labeled.
CST VerdictShort answer
Teams running mission-critical applications on AWS who need sub-hour recovery times without buying dedicated disaster recovery infrastructure should start here; AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery eliminates the capital expense of standby hardware by recovering directly into AWS at scale, and the free tier lets you test failover before committing. The service handles continuous replication of on-premises and cloud servers, so your RTO is limited by your network throughput, not your backup window. Skip this if your applications live outside AWS or if you need orchestrated failover across multiple cloud regions; Elastic Disaster Recovery is AWS-centric by design. Mid-market and enterprise teams running Kubernetes or OpenStack need Trilio specifically for ransomware recovery in cloud-native environments where traditional VM backup tools fall short. The platform maps directly to NIST RC.RP (incident recovery execution) and handles both stateless containers and stateful applications across Red Hat OpenShift, Mirantis, and Nutanix clusters. Skip this if your infrastructure is primarily on-premises VMware or you need backup for databases and file servers alongside Kubernetes; Trilio's strength is narrowly focused on cloud-native infrastructure recovery, not broad enterprise backup.
Based on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, integrations, company size fit, here is our conclusion:
