authentik vs WWPass MFA: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
authentik is a commercial multi-factor authentication and single sign-on tool by authentik. WWPass MFA is a commercial multi-factor authentication and single sign-on tool by wwpass. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best multi-factor authentication and single sign-on fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Startups and SMBs that need SSO and MFA without vendor lock-in should run authentik; the open-source model means you own the codebase, avoid licensing creep as you scale, and can self-host or go hybrid without renegotiating contracts. It covers NIST PR.AA identity management and access control natively, and the built-in application proxy handles remote access to RDP, SSH, and VNC without bolting on a separate tool. Expect to staff more ops lift than a SaaS alternative; this is not the tool for teams wanting a hands-off managed identity service.
Mid-market and enterprise teams replacing passwords for Salesforce-heavy workforces should evaluate WWPass MFA for its genuine passwordless model, which eliminates the username-password attack surface entirely rather than just layering MFA on top of it. The solution achieves NIST AAL3 compliance and integrates cleanly with Active Directory, making it credible for regulated industries like healthcare and finance. Skip this if you need broad SSO coverage across 50+ SaaS applications; WWPass is built specifically around Salesforce and doesn't pretend otherwise.
