AT&T Dynamic Defense vs BlockDoS DDoS Protection: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

AT&T Dynamic Defense

Mid-market and enterprise security teams that need DDoS mitigation without managing their own scrubbing centers should use AT&T Dynamic Defense; you're buying carrier-grade infrastructure and 24/7 managed response, not just software. AT&T's network position means attack traffic gets filtered upstream before it reaches your edge, which matters more than detection speed when you're absorbing volumetric floods. The NIST alignment skews toward Detect and recovery readiness rather than prevention architecture controls, so this works best for teams that accept DDoS as inevitable and want fast mitigation, not those betting on stopping attacks before they land.

BlockDoS DDoS Protection

SMBs and mid-market companies facing frequent DDoS attacks will find BlockDoS's flat-rate unlimited protection model more predictable than per-gigabit vendors, since you pay the same whether you're hit with a 10 Gbps or 500 Gbps assault. The 150+ global PoPs and multi-vendor mitigation strategy give you geographic redundancy and attack absorption capacity without bandwidth overage surprises. Skip this if your organization needs integrated WAF, bot management, or API protection bundled with DDoS mitigation; BlockDoS stays focused on volumetric and protocol attacks only.