Akamai Adaptive Media Delivery vs AT&T Dynamic Defense: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Akamai Adaptive Media Delivery

Mid-market and enterprise teams streaming video at scale need Akamai Adaptive Media Delivery for its 100% availability SLA and edge-native content control, which eliminates the operational overhead of managing origin failover and geographic access policies yourself. The platform's serverless edge compute and intelligent caching stack mean you're not paying for unused capacity or dealing with origin overload during traffic spikes. Skip this if your primary concern is DDoS mitigation rather than delivery reliability; Akamai excels at keeping streams live, not at stopping volumetric attacks before they reach your edge.

AT&T Dynamic Defense

Mid-market and enterprise security teams that need DDoS mitigation without managing their own scrubbing centers should use AT&T Dynamic Defense; you're buying carrier-grade infrastructure and 24/7 managed response, not just software. AT&T's network position means attack traffic gets filtered upstream before it reaches your edge, which matters more than detection speed when you're absorbing volumetric floods. The NIST alignment skews toward Detect and recovery readiness rather than prevention architecture controls, so this works best for teams that accept DDoS as inevitable and want fast mitigation, not those betting on stopping attacks before they land.