asvin Risk by Context™ vs Tenchi Zanshin: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

asvin Risk by Context™

Mid-market and enterprise security teams managing complex supplier networks will get the most from asvin Risk by Context™ because it actually surfaces hidden risk across multi-tier supply chains instead of stopping at tier-one vendors. The tool's geopolitical risk factoring and ransomware group exposure tracking per supplier give you threat intelligence you won't find in generic third-party risk platforms, and continuous OSINT re-evaluation means your assessments stay current without manual rescoring. Skip this if your supply chain is under 50 vendors or if you need compliance reporting that maps to specific frameworks; asvin focuses on cyber risk discovery rather than audit trail generation.

Tenchi Zanshin

Mid-market and enterprise security teams managing vendor risk across distributed third-party ecosystems should choose Tenchi Zanshin for its non-intrusive continuous monitoring that doesn't require vendor API keys or agent deployment. The platform covers NIST GV.SC supply chain risk management and DE.CM continuous monitoring, with daily automated testing that surfaces real-time remediation timelines rather than static risk scores. Skip this if your vendor base is small enough for manual quarterly assessments or if you need deep integration with your existing GRC platform; Tenchi's strength is scale and autonomous discovery, not replacing your compliance workflow.