ASPIA Infotech Security Workflow vs Surf Platform: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

ASPIA Infotech Security Workflow

Mid-market and enterprise security teams drowning in disconnected vulnerability data will get immediate value from ASPIA Infotech Security Workflow because it actually enforces risk-based remediation sequencing instead of treating all findings equally. The platform covers the full NIST path from asset inventory through incident response, with particular strength in continuous monitoring and GRC process automation, so you're not juggling separate tools for compliance reporting. Skip this if you need tight integration with your existing EDR or SIEM; ASPIA's strength is vulnerability and asset context, not incident detection and response.

Surf Platform

Mid-market and enterprise security teams drowning in alert noise from disconnected tools will see immediate value in Surf Platform's Business Context Graph, which connects assets, identities, permissions, and dependencies to surface only issues that actually matter to your business. The platform covers 12 NIST CSF 2.0 functions across governance, identification, protection, detection, and response, with particular strength in asset management and impact modeling before changes execute. Skip this if your team lacks the operational maturity to define asset ownership and risk appetite upfront; Surf's effectiveness depends on the context data you feed it, not on the tool doing heavy lifting for you.