Aryaka Unified SASE as a Service vs Neeve Secure Edge: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Aryaka Unified SASE as a Service

Mid-market and enterprise security teams managing distributed offices or remote workforces should evaluate Aryaka Unified SASE as a Service primarily for its single-pass inspection architecture, which eliminates the performance tax most SASE platforms impose on encrypted traffic. The platform's strength in PR.AA (Identity Management and Access Control) and PR.DS (Data Security) aligns with zero-trust enforcement and DLP simultaneously, reducing the number of tools you need to stitch together. Skip this if your priority is recovery and resilience orchestration; Aryaka is built for prevention and detection, not incident response automation.

Neeve Secure Edge

Mid-market and enterprise teams protecting OT and critical infrastructure networks need Neeve Secure Edge because it replaces VPN with Zero Trust access controls built specifically for operational technology, not borrowed from IT playbooks. SOC 2 Type 2 and ISO 27001 certification, combined with support for legacy OT systems alongside modern ones, means you're not ripping out your installed base to comply. Skip this if your environment is purely IT-focused or you need a single pane of glass for both OT and enterprise IT; Neeve is deliberately OT-first, which makes it powerful in that domain and narrow elsewhere.