Arsen Phishing Simulation vs PhishingBox Phishing Simulator: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Arsen Phishing Simulation

Security teams at mid-market and enterprise companies who need unlimited phishing variations without burning out their security staff should run Arsen Phishing Simulation. The platform's AI generates unique scenarios across email, SMS, voice, and BEC simultaneously, which means you're testing employee behavior against realistic threats instead of recycled templates. The adaptive difficulty engine adjusts based on individual performance, so struggling employees get harder campaigns while your security-aware staff don't waste time on trivial tests. One honest limitation: Arsen maps directly to NIST PR.AT awareness training but doesn't offer the post-breach investigation or forensics layers that larger enterprises sometimes expect in a full security awareness platform.

PhishingBox Phishing Simulator

Security teams at SMBs and mid-market companies will get real value from PhishingBox Phishing Simulator because it automates the entire awareness loop: you run a campaign, employees fail, they get enrolled in training automatically, and you see the results in real time without manual workflow steps. The Advanced Human Detection filter cuts false positives that plague generic simulators, and the 12-month campaign scheduler lets you build a year-long curriculum without constant reconfiguration. Skip this if you need deep integration with your existing security orchestration platform; PhishingBox works best as a standalone awareness tool, not as an automated response trigger inside your SOC.