Armour Mobile vs Soliton Secure Suite: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Armour Mobile

Enterprise and mid-market defence contractors need Armour Mobile specifically for classified comms that satisfy NATO and UK government approval without custom integration hell. NATO Restricted and OFFICIAL SENSITIVE clearance baked in, plus FOI-compliant audit trails and device revocation, means you skip the certification delays that kill typical commercial platforms in this space. NIST Identity Management and Data Security coverage is solid, though the feature set tilts heavily toward secure transport rather than zero-trust device posture; if your threat model centres on endpoint compromise before the encrypted channel, you'll need layered defences elsewhere. Wrong choice for non-defence organizations or anyone without classification requirements.

Soliton Secure Suite

Security teams managing BYOD environments where employees use personal devices for corporate work should evaluate Soliton Secure Suite for its secure workspace isolation; it contains corporate data and access on unmanaged endpoints without requiring full device enrollment or MDM. The platform covers four of NIST CSF 2.0's core functions (identity management, data security, platform security, and continuous monitoring), with particular strength in access control and data leak prevention on non-corporate hardware. This is not the right tool if your organization can enforce device management policies or standardize on company-owned devices; Soliton's value proposition exists precisely in the scenarios where IT has no device control.