Armour Communications Desktop vs Defguard Mobile VPN Client: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Armour Communications Desktop

Startups and SMBs that need licensed endpoint encryption without infrastructure overhead should evaluate Armour Communications Desktop for its Windows 10 native deployment and trial-first purchasing model. The vendor's NIST CSF 2.0 coverage in Identity Management and Access Control reflects a deliberate focus on authentication enforcement rather than detection or response capabilities. Skip this if you're managing heterogeneous OS environments or expect deep integration with your existing EDR stack; this is a purpose-built communications client, not a platform play.

Defguard Mobile VPN Client

Teams managing remote access for distributed workforces will find value in Defguard Mobile VPN Client because it combines WireGuard's performance with native 2FA and biometric authentication, eliminating the friction of separate MFA overlays. The cross-platform support (Linux, macOS, Windows, iOS, Android) and native SSO integration (Google, Microsoft, Okta) means faster rollout than legacy IPSec clients that require platform-specific builds. Skip this if you need centralized device posture checking or conditional access tied to endpoint security scores; Defguard handles authentication and policy distribution well but doesn't validate whether the connecting device is actually patched or compliant before granting access.