AppCheck CMS Security Scanning vs Sårbarhetsskanning: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

AppCheck CMS Security Scanning

Mid-market and enterprise teams managing WordPress, Drupal, or other CMS platforms need AppCheck CMS Security Scanning because it actually crawls modern JavaScript-heavy frontends instead of stopping at static HTML, catching XSS and IDOR flaws that traditional scanners miss. The scriptable browser interface handles multi-stage authentication, and continuous scanning with threat alerts keeps you honest between major releases. Skip this if your infrastructure is mostly API-first microservices with minimal CMS exposure; you'll pay for capabilities you don't need and gain less than a general-purpose DAST platform would offer.

Sårbarhetsskanning

Startup and SMB security leads should pick Sårbarhetsskanning for external-facing web applications when you need scanning that actually maps your attack surface instead of just running port scans. The tool covers both ID.RA risk assessment and PR.PS platform security through automated structure mapping and misconfiguration detection, which means you're getting vulnerability context, not just a list. Skip this if your infrastructure lives primarily behind authenticated systems or you're hunting for internal network weaknesses; Sårbarhetsskanning is built for the perimeter.