ANY.RUN vs CAPE: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

ANY.RUN

Incident response teams and threat hunters who need to detonate suspicious files in a controlled environment and watch the execution in real time will get the most from ANY.RUN; its interactive sandbox lets you pivot through network calls, registry changes, and process trees live rather than waiting for static analysis reports. The platform supports over 100 malware families with behavioral signatures, and the free tier removes friction for teams validating samples before escalation. Skip this if you need post-incident forensics or deep code-level debugging; ANY.RUN prioritizes live observation over artifact recovery.

CAPE

Threat analysts and malware researchers who need to detonate suspicious files without spinning up expensive enterprise sandboxes should start with CAPE; the free pricing and 3,070 GitHub stars mean you get a production-grade detonation engine without procurement cycles. CAPE's behavioral analysis and memory dumps give you the forensic detail required for incident response and threat intelligence work that commercial sandboxes often obscure behind simplified verdicts. Not the right fit if your team needs integration with EDR platforms or automated blocking; CAPE is a manual analysis tool, not an automated prevention layer.