Antiy PTA-mobile vs Malheur: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Antiy PTA-mobile is a commercial malware analysis tool by Antiy Labs. Malheur is a free malware analysis tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best malware analysis fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, integrations, company size fit, here is our conclusion:
Mid-market and enterprise security teams handling high-volume Android app intake will benefit most from Antiy PTA-mobile's ability to monitor 200+ dynamic behaviors across 26 categories in a single sandbox run, capturing network traffic, file artifacts, and UI state without manual case work. The hybrid deployment model supports both server-based processing for large app batches and portable device carriers for field analysis, making it practical for carriers and regional security ops. Skip this if your organization needs upstream static analysis as a primary control; Antiy's strength is post-deployment behavioral visibility, not catching issues before apps ship.
Incident response teams with limited budgets who need to triage unknown binaries will find Malheur's automated behavior analysis valuable for rapid malware classification. The tool's machine learning-driven approach handles thousands of samples without manual reverse engineering, and its 373 GitHub stars indicate active community validation of the analysis output. This is not a replacement for a full DFIR platform; Malheur excels at the initial "what is this file" question but lacks the investigation breadth and reporting capabilities enterprise incident handlers expect downstream.
